پایان نامه روشی برای تحلیل نیازهای غیرعملکردی در خط تولید نرم افزار

فهرست و منابع پایان نامه روشی برای تحلیل نیازهای غیرعملکردی در خط تولید نرم افزار

فهرست:

شماره عنوان                                                                                                                                     صفحه

١    فصل اول – کلیات تحقیق ..................................................................................................        ١

١-١ مقدمه .................................................................................................................................................................         2

١-٢ تعریف مساله ......................................................................................................................................................        ٢

١-٣ اهمیت و ضرورت تحقیق ................................................................................................................................        ٣

١-٤ اهداف تحقیق ....................................................................................................................................................        ٤

١-٥ روش تحقیق ......................................................................................................................................................        ٤

١-٤ محدوده و پرسش های تحقیق ......................................................................................................................        ٥

١-٥ مراحل انجام تحقیق  .......................................................................................................................................        ٥

١-٦ ساختار پایان نامه .............................................................................................................................................        ٧

٢    فصل دوم – مفاهیم بنیادین و پیشینه تحقیق ..................................................................        ٨

٢-١ مقدمه ................................................................................................................................................................          9

٢-٢ معرفی خط تولید نرم افزار ............................................................................................................................             9

٢-٢-١ معماری خط تولید نرم افزار  .........................................................................................................................        ١٠

٢-٢-٢ فرایند توسعه خط تولید نرم افزار ................................................................................................................        ١٠

٢-٢-٣ مهندسی دامنه خط تولید نرم افزار ..............................................................................................................        ١٣

٢-٢-٤ تغییرپذیری در خط تولید نرم افزار .............................................................................................................        ١٤

٢-٢-٤-١ مدیریت تغییرپذیری .....................................................................................................................        ١٥

٢-٢-٤-٢ بیان تغییرپذیری ............................................................................................................................        ١٦

٢-٣ نیازهای غیرعملکردی ......................................................................................................................................        ١٧

٢-٤ نیازهای غیرعملکردی خط تولید نرم افزار ..................................................................................................      ١٨

٢-٤-١ تغییرپذیری در نیازهای غیرعملکردی خط تولید نرم افزار .....................................................................      ١٨

٢-٥ تحلیل و مدلسازی نیازهای غیرعملکردی خط تولید نرم افزار ...............................................................        ٢٠

٢-٦ سنجه های موجود برای مدل ویژگی ها.......................................................................................................        ٢٢

٢-٧ پیشینه تحقیق ..................................................................................................................................................        ٢٥

٢-٧-١ رویکردهای موجود تحلیل و مدلسازی خط تولید نرم افزار ....................................................................      ٢٥

٢-٧-١-١ مدل مبتنی بر هدف .....................................................................................................................        ٢٦

٢-٧-١-٢ گراف وابستگی ویژگی-هدف نرم ...............................................................................................        ٢٧

 28        ........................................................................................................................... COVAMOF  3-1-7-2

٢-٧-١-٤ مدل توسعه یافته ویژگی ها .........................................................................................................        ٢٩

٢-٧-١-٥ سلسله مراتب تعریف .....................................................................................................................        ٣٠

٢-٧-١-٦ شبکه حدس بیزی .........................................................................................................................        ٣١

٢-٧-١-٧ روش نیازهای کیفی یک خانواده نرم افزار ...............................................................................        ٣٣

٢-٧-١-٨ روش ISPLM .............................................................................................................................        ٣٤

 

٢-٧-١-٩ روش IQ-SPLE .........................................................................................................................        ٣٤

٢-٧-١-١٠ روش آقای Peng و دیگران ........................................................................................................        ٣٦

٢-٨ جمع بندی مطالب فصل .................................................................................................................................        ٣٩

٣    فصل سوم – روش پیشنهادی .................................................................................................................      ٤١

٣-١ مقدمه .................................................................................................................................................................        ٤٢

٣-١-١ انتخاب روش استخراج اطلاعات ....................................................................................................................        ٤٢

٣-١-٢ انتخاب بستر مدلسازی مناسب .....................................................................................................................        ٤٤

٣-١-٣ طراحی روش مناسب تحلیل و مدلسازی نیازهای غیرعملکردی ..........................................................       ٤٥

٣-٢ فرایند روش پیشنهادی تحلیل جامع نیازهای غیرعملکردی...................................................................      ٤٦

٣-٢-١ فاز اول – استخراج نیازهای غیرعملکردی .................................................................................................        ٤٨

٣-٢-٢ فاز دوم – تحلیل تغییرپذیری نیازهای غیرعملکردی کیفی .................................................................        ٥١

٣-٢-٣ فاز سوم – تحلیل وابستگی های ضمنی .....................................................................................................        ٥٣

٣-٢-٤ فاز چهارم – یکپارچه سازی مدل ویژگی ها .............................................................................................        ٥٦

٣-٣ جمع بندی مطالب فصل ...............................................................................................................................        ٥٧

٤    فصل چهارم – ارزیابی روش پیشنهادی با استفاده از مطالعه موردی ..............................      ٥٩

٤-١ مقدمه .................................................................................................................................................................        ٦٠

٤-٢ معرفی سیستم MMLS ..............................................................................................................................        ٦٠

٤-٣ تشریح مدل ویژگی های سیستم MMLS .............................................................................................        ٦٢

٤-٤ انجام تحلیل نیازهای غیرعملکردی MMLS با روش پیشنهادی ......................................................        ٦٩

٤-٤-١ فاز اول – استخراج نیازهای غیرعملکردی .................................................................................................        ٦٩

٤-٤-٢ فاز دوم – تحلیل تغییرپذیری نیازهای غیرعملکردی کیفی ..................................................................        ٧٣

٤-٤-٣ فاز سوم – تحلیل وابستگی های ضمنی ....................................................................................................        ٧٦

٤-٤-٤ فاز چهارم – یکپارچه سازی مدل ویژگی ها .............................................................................................        ٧٨

٤-٥ سنجش مدل خروجی با سنجه های موجود .............................................................................................        ٨١

٤-٦ جمع بندی مطالب فصل .................................................................................................................................        ٨٦

٥    فصل پنجم – نتیجه گیری و کارهای آینده .......................................................................      ٨٨

٥-١ مقدمه .................................................................................................................................................................        ٨٩

٥-٢ مقایسه روش پیشنهادی با سایر روش ها ...................................................................................................        ٨٩

٥-٣ تحقق اهداف و پاسخ به پرسش های تحقیق .............................................................................................        ٩١

٥-٥ نوآوری های تحقیق .........................................................................................................................................        ٩١

٥-٥ کاستی های تحقیق ..........................................................................................................................................        ٩١

٥-٦ نتیجه گیری ......................................................................................................................................................        ٩٢

٥-٧ کارهای آینده .....................................................................................................................................................        ٩٢

 مراجع ................................................................................................................................................................      ٩٣

 پیوست ١ – فهرست اختصارات ...............................................................................................................      ٩٧

 چکیده انگلیسی ................................................................................................................................................................

 

منبع:

 

[1] Van der Linden,F., Software Product Lines in Action; The best industrial

practice in product line engineering, Springer, 2007.

 [2] Bass,L., Clements, P. and Kazman, R., Software Architecture in Practice,

Second Edition, Addison Wesley ,second edition, 2003.

 

[3] Gomma, H., Designing software product lines with UML: from Use cases to

Pattern-Based Software Architectures, Addison Wesley, 2004.

 

[4] Cohen,Sholom, et al., Managing Variation in Services in a Software

Product Line Context ,SEI 2010.

 

[5] Peng,Xin, et al., Feature-Oriented Nonfunctional Requirements Analysis

for Software Product      Line, Journal of Computer Science and Technology,

2009.

 

[6] Luiz Marcio Cysneiros, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite: Nonfunctional

Requirements: From Elicitation to Conceptual Models. IEEE Trans. Software

Eng., 2004, 30(5): 328-350.

 

[7]  Nestor,  D.S.,  Botterweck,G.,  Cawley,C.  and  Healy.  P.,  Applying

Visualization  Techniques  in  Software  product  Lines,  SOFTVIS  2008,

Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany, September 16-17,2008.

 

[8] Timo Kakola · Juan Carlo s Duenas (Eds.), Software Product Line,

Research Issues in Engineering and Management, Springer, 2006.

 

[9] John, I. & Pech, D., Scalable Variability Instantiation Strategies: Scalable

Modeling Techniques for Software Product Lines (SCALE 2009) Workshop,

13th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2009). San

Francisco,                      California,     August           2009,             Available:

http:..www.splc.net.prevconferences.splc -2009.pdf

 

[10] Bachmann, F., Goedicke, M. , Leite, J.,  Nord, R., Pohl, K., Ramesh, B.,

and Vilbig, A., A meta-model for representing variability in product family

development, In Proceedings in the 5th International Workshop on Product

Family Engineering (PFE’5), pages 66–80, 2003.

 

[11] Pohl, K., B¨ockle, G., and van der Linden, F., Software Product Line

Engineering:Foundations, Principles, and Techniques, Springer, 2005.

 

[12] Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation, Technical Report

SPC-92019-CMC, Reuse-Driven Software Processes Guidebook, Version

02.00.03, November 1993.

[13] Schmid., K.,  Scoping software product lines — an analysis of an

emerging technology, In Patrick Donohoe, editor, Software Product Lines:

Experience and Research Directions; Proceedings of the First Software

Product  Line  Conference  (SPLC1),  pages  513–532.  Kluwer Academic

Publishers, 2000.

[14] Schmid, K., and John., I., A customizable approach to full lifecycle

variability management. Science of computer programming, 53(3):259–284,

2004.

[15] Jacobson, I., Booch, G., and Rumbaugh, J., “The Unified Software

Development Process,” Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1999.

[16] Glinz, M., “On  Non-Functional Requirements,”  RE’07, 15th  IEEE

International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 21-26, Oct. 2007.

[17] Software Engineering Institute. Software Architecture Glossary, Available:

http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.architecture.start.glossary. (2009).

[18] Bass,L., Clements, P. and Kazman, R., Software Architecture in Practice,

Second Edition, Addison Wesley ,second edition, 2003.

[19] IEEE. Ieee standard 1061-1992. ieee standard for a software quality

metrics methodology, 1993.

[20] L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software architecture in practice.

Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1998.

 [21]  Etxeberria,  Leire,  et  al.,  Quality  aware  Software  Product  Line

Engineering, Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 2008.

[22] John Mylopoulos, Lawrence Chung, Brian A. Nixon: Representing and

Using Nonfunctional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach.

IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 1992, 18(6): 483-497.

[23] Alistair Sutcliffe and Shailey Minocha. Scenario-based Analysis of Non-

Functional  Requirements. Workshop  on  Requirements  Engineering  For

Software Quality (REFSQ’98) at CAiSE’98 in Pisa, Italy, June 1998.

[24] Lawrence Chung, Brian A. Nixon, Eric Yu, John Mylopoulos. Non-

Functional  Requirements  in  Software  Engineering.  Kluwer  Academic

Publishers, 2000.

[25] Etxeberria, L. ,et al., Modeling Variation in Quality Attributes, Computer

Science Department, University of Mondagon, Spain, 2006.

[26] E. Niemelä. Architecture centric software family engineering, product

family engineering seminar. Tutorial in 5th Working IEEE.IFIP Conference on

Software Architecture (WICSA), 2005.

[27] Bartholdt, J., Medak, M., Oberhauser, R., Integrating Quality Modeling

with Feature Modeling in Software Product Lines, Aalen University, 2009.

[28] Benavides, D., Trinidad, P., Ruiz-cortés, A., “Automated Reasoning on

th

Feature Models,” LNCS, Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 17

International Conference, CAISE 2005.

[29] Mendonca, M., Wasowski, A., Czarnecki, K., Cowan, D., “Efficient

compilation techniques for large scale feature models,” In  Generative

Programming and Component Engineering, 7th International Conference,

GPCE , Proceedings, pages 13–22, 2008.

[30] Fernandez-Amoros, D., Gil, R.H., Somolinos, J.C., “Inferring Information

from Feature Diagrams to Product Line Economic Models,” ACM International

Conference Proceeding Series Vol. 446, Proceedings of the 13th Internationsl

Software Product Line Conference, pp. 41-50, 2009.

[31]  Czarnecki, K., Kim, P., “Cardinality-based  feature  modeling  and

constraints: A progress report,” In Proceedings of the International Workshop

on Software Factories At OOPSLA 2005, Page 6,  2005.

 

[32] Kasikci, B.C., Bilgen, S., “Scalable modeling of software product line

variability,” 13th International Software Product Line Conference, Page 7,

SPLC 2009, San Francisco, August 2009.

[33] Benavides, D., Segura, S., Ruiz-Cortés, A., “Automated analysis of

feature models 20 years later: A literature review,” Information Systems, 2010.

[34] B. González-Baixauli, J. C. S. do Prado Leite, and J. Mylopoulos. Visual

variability analysis for goal models. In 12th IEEE International Conference on

Requirements Engineering (RE), pages 198–207. IEEE Computer Society,

2004.

[35] S. Jarzabek, B. Yang, and S. Yoeun. Addressing quality attributes in

domain analysis for product lines. IEE Proceedings - Software, 153(2):61–73,

2006.

[36] M. Sinnema, S. Deelstra, J. Nijhuis, and J. Bosch. Covamof: A framework

for modeling variability in software product families. In R. L. Nord, editor, 3rd

International Conference on Software Product Lines, SPLC, Proceedings,

volume 3154 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 197–213.

Springer, sep 2004.

 [37] J. Kuusela and J. Savolainen. Requirements engineering for product

families. In ICSE '00: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on

Software engineering, pages 61–69, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press.

[38] H. Zhang, S. Jarzabek, and B. Yang. Quality prediction and assessment

for product lines. In J. Eder and M. Missikoff, editors, 15th International

Conference  on  Advanced   Information  Systems   Engineering,  CAiSE,

Proceedings, volume 2681 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages

681–695. Springer, 2003.

[39] E. Niemelä. Quality driven family architecture development. Tutorial in

SPLC (Software Product Line Conference), 2005.

[40]  L. Chung, D. Gross, and E. S. K. Yu. Architectural design to meet

stakeholder requirements.  In WICSA1: Proceedings of the TC2 First Working

IFIP  Conference on Software Architecture  (WICSA1),  pages 545–564,

Deventer, The Netherlands, 1999. Kluwer, B.V.

[41] Siegmund, N., Kuhlemann, M., Rosenm¨uller , M., Kaestner, C. and

Saake , G., Integrated Product Line Model for Semi-Automated Product

Derivation Using Non-Functional Properties, University of Magdeburg.

[42]  Ye,  H.,  Liu,  H.,  Approach  to  modelling  feature  variability  and

dependencies in software product lines, Electrical Engineering, June 2005.

[43] Niemelä, E., Immonen, A., Capturing quality requirements of product

family architecture, Information and Software Technology 49 (2007) 1107–

1120, 2007.

[44] User Manual, Meteorological Measurement and Logging System, Khalij-

e-Fars Data Mining CO., Tehran,  2008.

[45] Stellman, A., Greene, J., Applied Software Project Management, O'Reilly

Media. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-596-00948-9, 2005.

[46] Galliers, R. D., Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches, In

R. D. Galliers, Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical

Guidelines, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, pp. 144, 1992.

[47] Yin, R., Case Study Research – Design and Methods, Sage Publications,

2003.

[48] ISO.IEC 9126-1:2001(E), Software engineering — Product Quality —

Part 1: Quality Model.