فهرست و منابع پایان نامه ارزیابی میزان تأثیر پذیری خط تولید نرم افزار از قابلیت استخراج
فهرست:
فصل اول : کلیات تحقیق .......................................................... ١
١-١-مقدمه ............................................................................................................................ ٢
١-٢-تعریف مسئله .................................................................................................................... ٤
١-٣-اهداف و‌محدوده تحقیق ....................................................................................................... ٥
١-٤-سئوالات تحقیق ................................................................................................................. ٥
١-٥-ساختار گزارش .................................................................................................................. ٦
فصل دوم : مروری بر ادبیات موضوع و کارهای مرتبط ....................... ٧
٢-١-مقدمه ............................................................................................................................ ٨
٢-٢-ویژگی های کیفی در‌مهندسی نرم افزار....................................................................................... ٨
٢-٢-١-خصوصیات کیفی سیستم .............................................................................................٩
٢-٢-٢- خصوصیات کیفی حرفه .............................................................................................. ١٠
٢-٢-٣-خصوصیات کیفی معماری ........................................................................................... ١٢
٢-٣-خط تولیدنرم افزار ............................................................................................................ ١٣
٢-٣-١-تعریف خط تولیدنرم افزار ........................................................................................... ١٤
٢-٣-٢-داراییهای اصلی ...................................................................................................... ١٤
٢-٣-٣-داراییهای اصلی پایه ................................................................................................. ١٥
٢-٣-٤-مزایای خط تولیدنرم افزار‌برای معمار‌یا‌توسعه دهنده اصلی ................................................... ١٥
٢-٣-٥-هزینه ایجاد‌یک خط تولیدنرم افزار ................................................................................ ١٥
٢-٣-٦-حیطه بندی ............................................................................................................. ١٦
٢-٣-٧-معماری خط تولید.................................................................................................... ١٨
٢-٣-٧-١-تعیین نقاط تغییر .......................................................................................................... ١٩
٢-٣-٧-٢-حمایت از نقاط تغییر ..................................................................................................... ٢٠
٢-٣-٧-٣-ارزیابی معماری در جهت متناسب بودن برای خط تولید ................................................ ٢٠
٢-٣-٨-دامنه ................................................................................................................... ٢١
ی
٢-٣-٩-چرخه حیات خط تولید نرم افزار .................................................................................... ٢٢
٢-٣-٩-١-مهندسی دامنه ............................................................................................... ٢٣
٢-٣-٩-٢-مهندسی محصول ............................................................................................ ٢٤
٢-٣-١٠-نمودار‌ویژگی ها ...................................................................................................... ٢٤
٢-٤-تکنیک های MAPوOARبرای‌کاوش معماری‌و‌تحلیل سیستم های‌موروثی ........................................ ٢٥
٢-٤-١-مفهوم کاوش .......................................................................................................... ٢٦
٢-٤-٢-روش های MAPوOAR ........................................................................................... ٢٦
٢-٤-٣-روش MAP........................................................................................................... ٢٨
٢-٤-٣-١-آماده سازی .................................................................................................... ٢٨
٢-٤-٣-٢-استخراج ....................................................................................................................... ٢٨
٢-٤-٣-٣-ترکیب .......................................................................................................... ٢٨
٢-٤-٣-٤-توصیف ......................................................................................................... ٢٩
٢-٤-٣-٥-ارزیابی .......................................................................................................... ٢٩
٢-٤-٣-٦-دور‌دوم ....................................................................................................................... ٢٩
٢-٤-٤-روش OAR ........................................................................................................... ٣٠
٢-٤-٤-١-برقراری فعالیت زمینۀ‌کاوش ................................................................................ ٣١
٢-٤-٤-٢-موجودی برداری از‌مؤلفه ها .................................................................................. ٣١
٢-٤-٤-٣-تحلیل مؤلفه های نامزد ....................................................................................... ٣٢
٢-٤-٤-٤-برنامه ریزی جهت گزینه های‌کاوش ......................................................................... ٣٢
٢-٤-٤-٥-انتخاب گزینه کاوش .......................................................................................... ٣٢
٢-٤-٥-مطالعه موردی :نمونه ای از‌شیوه های MAP وOAR ........................................................... ٣٢
٢-٤-٥-١- نتایج روش MAP ........................................................................................................ ٣٤
٢-٤-٥-١-١-دید‌مؤلفه ............................................................................................................ ٣٤
٢-٤-٥-١-٢-سبک های معماری و‌ویژگی‌ها .................................................................................. ٣٥
٢-٤-٥-١-٣-دید‌اجرا .............................................................................................................. ٣٦
٢-٤-٥-١-٤-دید‌جریان داده ها...................................................................................... ٣٧
٢-٤-٥-١-٥-تحلیل سبک ها‌و‌ویژگی ها............................................................................ ٣٨
ک
٢-٤-٥-٢-به کارگیری روش OAR ..................................................................................... ٣٩
٢-٥-کیفیت درخط تولیدنرم افزار ................................................................................................. ٤٣
٢-٥-١-برخی متریک ها‌برای ارزیابی کیفیت خط تولید.................................................................. ٤٤
٢-٥-١-١-سنجش تشابه .................................................................................................. ٤٥
٢-٥-١-٢-اندازه گیری تغییرپذیری ...................................................................................... ٤٥
٢-٥-١-٣-سنجش قابلیت استفاده مجدد............................................................................... ٤٧
٢-٥-١-٤-قابلیت استفاده مجدد‌مرتبط با‌محصولات (PrR)....................................................... ٤٨
٢-٥-١-٥-درصد‌استفاده مجدد ...................................................................................................... ٤٩
٢-٦-نتیجه گیری .................................................................................................................... ٤٩
فصل سوم : ویژگی کیفی قابلیت استخراج ................................... ٥١
٣-١-مقدمه .......................................................................................................................... ٥٢
٣-٢-تعریف قابلیت استخراج ...................................................................................................... ٥٢
٣-٣-سناریوی عمومی استخراج داراییهای اصلی ............................................................................... ٥٢
٣-٤-روش اندازه گیری قابلیت استخراج .......................................................................................... ٥٥
٣-٤-١-روش پویا‌برای اندازه گیری وزن داراییها ......................................................................... ٦٠
٣-٤-١-١-روش اول ....................................................................................................... ٦٠
٣-٤-١-٢-روش دوم ...................................................................................................... ٦٠
٣-٤-٢-ورودی های مورد‌نیاز‌برای محاسبه قابلیت استخراج ............................................................ ٦٠
٣-٥-قابلیت استخراج توسعه یافته ................................................................................................ ٦١
٣-٦-توانایی‌استخراج سازمان ..................................................................................................... ٦١
٣-٧-مزایای قابلیت استخراج برای سازمان ...................................................................................... ٦٢
٣-٨-همبستگی مثبت و‌منفی قابلیت استخراج با‌سایر‌خصوصیات کیفی ................................................... ٦٢
٣-٩-قابلیت استخراج ویژگی کیفی خط تولید‌است یا‌معماری خط تولید؟ ................................................. ٦٩
٣-١٠-شیوه بهبود‌معماری خط تولید‌پس از‌محاسبه قابلیت استخراج ....................................................... ٧٠
٣-١١-ارزیابی استفاده مجدددرخط تولیدنرم افزار ............................................................................. ٧٠
٣-١١-١-درصد‌وزنی استفاده مجدد ......................................................................................... ٧١
٣-١١-٢-سهولت احیای داراییها‌برای تطبیق با‌معماری خط تولیدنرم افزار ......................................... ٧٢
ل
٣-١١-٣-چند‌متریک برای ارزیابی استفاده مجدد‌بر‌اساس نگاشت خط تولیدنرم افزار‌به گراف .................... ٧٤
٣-١١-٣-١-محاسبه سود‌استفاده مجدددرخط تولید................................................................ ٧٥
٣-١١-٣-٢-تاثیراستفاده مجدد‌یک دارایی‌در‌توسعه یک محصول .................................................. ٧٦
٣-١١-٣-٣-تاثیراستفاده مجدد‌در‌توسعه یک محصول ............................................................. ٧٦
٣-١١-٣-٤-تاثیراستفاده مجدد‌در‌توسعه تمام محصولات خط تولید ............................................. ٧٧
٣-١٢-نتیجه گیری .................................................................................................................. ٧٧
فصل چهارم : مطالعه موردی .................................................... ٧٩
٤-١-مقدمه .......................................................................................................................... ٨٠
٤-٢-روش انجام ارزیابی :شبیه سازی مونت کارلو ................................................................................ ٨١
٤-٣-شرح مطالعه موردی ........................................................................................................... ٨٤
٤-٤-تجزیه و‌تحلیل نتایج به دست آمده از‌مطالعه موردی ..................................................................... ٩٦
٤-٥-نتیجه گیری .................................................................................................................. ١٠٠
فصل پنجم : نتیجه گیری و کار آینده ...........................................١٠١
٥-١-نتیجه گیری ................................................................................................................. ١٠٢
٥-٢-کار‌آینده .................................................................................................................... ١٠٦
پیوست ها ......................................................................... ١٠٧
پیوست ١:جداول مربوط به مطالعه موردی ..................................................................................... ١٠٨
مراجع ............................................................................. ١٢٣
منبع:
[1] M.Mirakhorli, ‘Assessment of Software Product line Reliability’, MSC thesis,
Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, 2007.
[2] Glossary, 2010, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.architecture.start.glossary.
[3] L.Bass, P.Clements and R.Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, Second
Edition, Addison Wesley, 2003.
[4] L.Northrop, Software Product Lines Essentials, Presentation, Carnegie Mellon
University, 2008.
[5] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.glossary.htm
[6] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.coreADA.htm
[7] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.benefits.costs.htm
[8] P. Istoan, “Software Product Lines and Service-Oriented Architectures: Can they
be Connected?”, Bibliographical study, Triskell Project, 2009, Available:
ftp:..ftp.irisa.fr.local.caps.DEPOTS.BIBLIO2009.Istoan_Paul.pdf
[9] V.Myll¨arniemi, .M¨annist¨o and M.Raatikainen, “Quality Attribute Variability
within a Software Product Family Architecture”, 2006, Available:
http:..www.soberit.hut.fi.vmyllarn.publications.Myllarniemi06bQualityAttributeVa
riability.pdf
[10] L.Etxeberria and Goiuria Sagardui, “Evaluation of Quality Attribute Variability in
Software Product Families,” 15th Annual IEEE International Conference and
Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, pp. 255-264, 2008.
[11] F.Bachmann and P.Clements, Variability in Software Product Lines, Technical
Report, Carnegie Mellon University, 2006.
[12] T.Kim, I.Ko, S.Kang and D.Lee, Extending ATAM to Assess Product Line
Architecture, IEEE, 2008.
[13] L. Northrop, “SEI’s Software Product Line Tenets,” IEEE Software, Vol. 19,
124
No. 4, pp. 32-40, July 2002.
[14] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.rel_domains.htm
[15] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.PL.essential.act.htm
[16] A. Helfericj, G. Herzwurm, S. Jesse, M. Mikusz, “Software Product Lines,
Service-oriented Architecture and Frameworks: Worlds Apart or Ideal
Partners?”, TEAA 2006 LNCS 4473, pp. 187-201, 2007.
[17] H. Gomma, Designing software product lines with UML: from Use cases to
Pattern-Based Software Architectures, Addison Wesley, 2004.
[18] F.Van der Linden, Software Product Lines in Action: The best industrial practice
in product line engineering, Springer, 2007.
[19] P.Istoan, G.Nain, G.Perrouin, Je’z e’que and J.Jean-Marc, ”Dynamic Software
Product Lines for Service-Based Systems,” CIT 09: IEEE Ninth International
Conference on Computer and Information Technology, pp. 193 – 198, 2009.
[20] K. C. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, K. Kim, E. Shin and M. Huh, “Form: A feature-
oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures”. Ann. Softw.
Eng. 5, pp. 143–168, 1998.
[21] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.miningEAs.htm
[22] Liam OíBrien and Dennis Smith, MAP and OAR Methods: Techniques for
Developing Core Assets for Software Product Lines from Existing Assets,
Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
[23] B.Geertsema and S.Jansen, “Increasing software product reusability and variability
using active components: a software product line infrastructure”, ACM, 2010.
[24] F.Amin, A.Mahmood, and A.Oxley, “A Proposed Reusability Attribute Model for
Aspect Oriented Software Product Line Components”, IEEE, 2010.
[25] T.Zhang, L.Deng, J.Wu, Q.Zhou and C.Ma, “Some Metrics for Accessing Quality
of Product Line Architecture,” IEEE, Vol 27, Issue 3, pp. 35 – 41, 2008.
[26] C.Berger and C Busse, “Product Line Metrics for Legacy Software in Practice,”
The 14th International Software Product Line (SPLC), pp.247-250, 2010.
125
[27] C.Berger, H. Rendel and B.Rumpe, “Measuring the Ability to Form a Product Line
from Existing Products,” Variability Modelling of
Software-intensive Systems (VaMos), pp. 151-154, 2010.
[28] A.van der Hoek, E.Dincel and N.Medvidoviü, “Using Service Utilization Metrics
to Assess the Structure of Product Line Architectures,” Proceedings of the Ninth
International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’03), pp. 298-308, IEEE,
2003.
[29] G.Aldekoa, S.Trujillo, G.Sagardui and O.Díaz, Experience Measuring
Maintainability in Software Product Lines, XV Jornadas de Ingeniería del Software
y Bases de Datos (JISBD), pp. 173-182, 2006.
[30] A.Rahman, Metrics for the Structural Assessment of Product Line Architecture,
MSC Thesis, School of Engineering at Blekinge Institu te of Technology, Sweden,
2004.
[31] E.Junior, I.Gimenes and J.Maldonado, “A Metric Suite to Support Software
Product Line Architecture Evaluation”, XXXIV Conferencia Latinoamericana de
Informática (CLEI 2008), pp. 489-498, 2008.
Automated Reasoning on Feature“Dِ.Benavides, P.Trinidad and A.Ruiz-cortés, [32]
th
Models,” LNCS, Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 17
International Conference, pp. 491-503, CAISE 2005.
[33] M.Mendonca, A.Wasowski, K.Czarnecki and D.Cowan, “Efficient compilation
techniques for large scale feature models,” In Generative Programming and
Component Engineering, 7th International Conference, GPCE , Proceedings,
pp.13–22, 2008.
[34] D.Fernandez-Amoros, R.Gil and J.Somolinos, “Inferring Information from Feature
Diagrams to Product Line Economic Models,” ACM International Conference
Proceeding Series Vol. 446, Proceedings of the 13th Internationsl Software Product
Line Conference, pp. 41-50, 2009.
[35] K.Czarnecki and P.Kim “Cardinality-based feature modeling and constraints: A
progress report,” International Workshop on Software Factories At OOPSLA 2005,
PP.331-348, ACM, 2005.
126
[36] B.Kasikci and S.Bilgen, “Scalable modeling of software product line variability,”
13th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2009, Vol. 2, pp. 134-
141 August 2009.
[37] D.Benavides, S.Segura and A.Ruiz-Cortés, “Automated analysis of feature models
20 years later: A literature review,” Information Systems, Volume 35, Issue 6,
pp.615-636, 2010.
[38] J.Wijnstra, Quality Attributes and Aspects of a Medical Product Family, IEEE,
2001.
[39] Pattern-Based Architecture Analysis and Design of Embedded Software Product
Lines, EMPRESS consortium, 2003.
[40] P.Clements, J.McGregor and S.Cohen, The Structured Intuitive Model for Product
Line Economics (SIMPLE), TECHNICAL REPORT, Carnegie Mellon University,
2005.
[41] J.P.Nóbrega, ‘An Integrated Cost Model for Product Line Engineering’, M.Sc.
Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2008,
Available:http:..www.ivanmachado.com.br.research.rise.thesis.files.2008_JarleyN
obrega_msc.pdf
[42] J.P.Nóbrega, E.S.de Almeida And S.R.L.Meira, “InCoME: Integrated Cost Model
for Product Line Engineering,” 34th Euromicro Conference Software Engineering
and Advanced Applications, IEEE, pp.27-34, 2008.
[43] C.Thörn, A Quality Model for Evaluating Feature Models, Software product line
conference (SPLC), pp. 184-190, 2007.
[44] A.Trendowicz and T.Punter, Quality Modeling for Software Product Lines, 7th
ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software
Engineering (QAOOSE’03), 2003.
[45] J.Bartholdt, M.Medak and R.Oberhauser, Integrating Quality Modeling with
Feature Modeling in Software Product Lines, Fourth International Conference on
Software Engineering Advances,pp. 365-370, 2009.
[46] L.Etxeberria, G.Sagardui and L.Belateg, “Quality aware Software Product Line
Engineering,” Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, pp.57-69, 2008.
127
[47] C.Elsner, G.Botterweck, D.Lohmann and W.Schröder-Preikschat, “Variability in
Time — Product Line Variability and Evolution Revisited,” Fourth International
Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (VaMos), pp.
131-137, 2010.
[48] D.Zubrow and G.Chastek, Measures for Software Product Lines, Technical Report,
Carnegie Mellon University, 2003.
[49] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.operations.htm
[50] A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version5.0, 2009, Available:
http:..www.sei.cmu.edu.productlines.frame_report.tech_planning.htm
[51] L.G.Jones, Product Line Acquisition in the DoD: The Promise, The Challenges,
Technical Note, Carnegie Mellon University, 1999.
[52] P.Berander, L.Damm, J.Eriksson, T.Gorschek, K. Henningsson, P.Jönsson,
S.Kågström, D.Milicic, F.Mårtensson, K.Rönkkö and P.Tomaszewski, Software
quality attributes and trade-offs, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2005.
[53] N.Modiri, K.Sadre Refiei and S.Ahangari, Software Quality, mehregane Ghalam,
2010.
[54] F.P. Brooks, The Mythical Man Month, Anniversary Edition, ADDISON-
WESLEY, 1995.
[55] IEEE, Guide to the Software Engineering, 2004 Version, IEEE, 2004.
[56] P.Grubb, SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE :Concepts and Practice, SECOND ED
ITION, World Scientific, 2003.
[57] J.S.Poulin and J.M.Caruso, A Reuse Metrics and Return on Investment Model,
IEEE, 1993.