فهرست و منابع پایان نامه بررسی روابط بین سبک های تفکر و رویکردهای یادگیری با پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشآموزان دختر سال سوم متوسطه منطقه یک تهران
فهرست:
ندارد.
منبع:
فارسی
ابریشم، محمد ابراهیم، (1374)، نقش آموزش و پرورش در رشد تفکر خلاق، کارشناسی ارشد دانشکده علوم و تحقیقات.
اتکنیسون، رتیال و همکاران، (1370)، زمینه روانشناسی، جلد اول، ترجمه محمد تقی براهنی و همکاران، چاپ دوم، تهران، انتشارات رشد، (تاریخ انتشار به زبان اصلی 1938).
استرنبرگ، رابرت جی، (1381)، سبکهای تفکر، ترجمه علاء الدین اعتمادی اهری و علی اکبر جعفری، چاپ دوم، تهران، نشر و پژوهش دادار، (تاریخ انتشار به زبان اصلی 1997).
اسپالهنیک جریل، ال، (1377)، انگیزش در کلاس درس، مترجم محمد رضا نائینیان و اسماعیل بیابانگر، انتشارات مدرسه.
استپیک دیبوراجی، (1385)، انگیزش برای یادگیری (از نظریه ناعمل) ترجمه دکتر رمضان حسنزاده و نرجس عمویی، انتشارات دنیای پژوهش.
ایزدی فر، آذین، (1379)، شش کلده تفکر، تالیف دوبونو، تهران: انتشارات پیک بهار.
بیارهرکنهان و بیتواج الون، (1385)، نظریههای یادگیری، ترجمه علی اکبر سیف، انتشارات نشر دوران.
پارسا، محمد، (1376)، روانشناسی تربیتی، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات علمی.
جان راجر – تپرمک و ویلیامز، (1383)، تفکر منفی، ترجمه قراچه دائمی، چاپ اول، انتشارات بیتا.
راس، آلناُ، (1373)، نظریهها و فرآیند، (سیاوش جمالفر، مترجم) تهران، انتشارات بعثت
دیویی جان، دموکراسی و آموزش و پرورش، ترجمه دکتر امیر حسین آریانپور، انتشارات موسسه فرانکین (سابق)، 1339.
سری و استاواد، (1382)، سبکهای شناختی (از دیدگاه تعلیم و تربیت)، ترجمه داریوش نوروزی و اکبر صالحی، تهران: انتشارات امیر.
سیف، علی اکبر، (1375)، روانشناسی پرورشی و روانشناسی یادگیری و آموزش، تهران، انتشارت آگاه.
شاملو، سعید، (1368)، سبکها و نظریهها در روان شناسی شخصیت، تهران، انتشارات رشد.
شریفی، حسن پاشا و نجفی زاده، جعفر، (1375) روشهای آماری در علوم رفتاری، تهران، نشر دانا.
شعاری نژاد، علی اکبر، (1375)، فرهنگ علوم رفتاری، تهران، انتشارات امیرکبیر.
شعاری نژاد، علیاکبر، (1378)، روانشناسی رشد، موسسه اطلاعات.
شعاری نژاد، علیاکبر، (1375) مبانی روانشناختی تربیت، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
شعاری نژاد، علیاکبر، (1362)، روانشناسی یادگیری، انتشارات توش.
شعاری نژاد، علیاکبر، (1380)، نگاهی نو به روانشناسی آموختن یا روان شناسی تغییر رفتار، انتشارات جانبخش، جلد اول.
شعاری نژاد، علیاکبر، در آمدی به روان شناسی انسان، انتشارات آزاده، 1371.
کدیور، پروین، روانشناسی یادگیری، انتشارات صحت، 1386.
کریمی، یوسف، (1375)، روانشناسی شخصیت، تهران، موسسه نشر ویرایش.
کریمی، یوسف، (1376)، روانشناسی اجتماعی (نظریهها، مفاهیم، کاربردها)، تهران، نشر ارسباران.
گلاور، جانی ای و برونینگ، راجراچ، روانشناسی تربیتی، اصول و کاربرد آن، ترجمه علینقی خرازی، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، 1385.
لفرانکویس، گای، آر، (1370)، روانشناسی برای آموزش، ترجمه مینجه شهی ییلاق، تهران، انتشارات رشد (تاریخ انتشار به زبان اصلی، 1979).
فرانکن، رابرت لی، مترجمان شمس اسفندآباد، علیرضا محمود، سوزان امامپور، انتشارات نی، 1384.
جایزر، چت، آموزش تفکر انتقادی، ترجمه دکتر خدایا ابیلی، انتشارات سمت، 1374.
مان – ن، اصول روانشناسی، ترجمه محمود صناعی، موسسه فرانکین (سابق)، 1342.
نادری، عزتا... و سیف نراقی، مریم، (1376)، روشهای تحقیق و چگونگی ارزیابی آن در علوم انسانی، تهران، دفتر تحقیقات و انتشارات مدبر.
هومن، حیدرعلی، 1376، شناخت روش علمی در علوم رفتاری (پایهای پژوهش)، تهران: نشر پارسا.
پایان نامه ها
- امامی پور ، سوزان ، سیف ،علی اکبر (1382).بررسی تحولی سبک های تفکر در دانش آموزان و دانشجویان و رابطه آنها با خلاقیت و پیشرفت تحصیلی ، فصلنامه نوآوری های آموزشی ،سال دوم ، شماره 3.
- امامی پور ، سوزان ، (1380).بررسی تحولی سبک های تفکر در دانش آموزان و دانشجویان و رابطه آن با خلاقیت و پیشرفت تحصیلی ،رساله دکتری (چاپ نشده) ،واحد علوم تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
- برخوردار پور ، زهرا ، (1378).بررسی توانش های ذهنی و الگوهای تفکر با پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش آموزان راهنمایی و دبیرستان ، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد (چاپ نشده).دانشکده روان شناسی وعلوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران.
- شکری ،امید ، (1385).بررسی رابطه صفات شخصیت و رویکردهای یادگیری با پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان ،فصلنامه روانشناختی ، شماره 8.
- فرخی ،نورعلی ،(1383).اثر مشترک راهبردهای یادگیری سسبک های تفکر بر پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش آموزان دوم راهنمایی شهر تهران.رساله دکتری (چاپ نشده) ، تهران ، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
English
1- Albaili, M. A. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Thinking Styles Inventory: Evidence from United Areb Emirates. Proceedings of the 2006 Joint Annual conference of the Australian psychologys Society and New Zealand Psychological Society, Auckland, New Zeahand, 26 – 30 September, 2006.
2- ARMSTRONG , S, J. (2000). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20, 323 – 339.
3- Akande, A. (1998). Towards the multicultural validation of a Western model of student approaches to learning. Education, 119 (1), 37 – 47.
4- Baird, J. R. & White, R.T. (1982). Promoting self control of learning. Instructional Science, 11, 227 – 247.
5- Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 151 – 161.
6- BERNADO. A. B. ZHANG. L. R. & CALLUENG. C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 149-163.
7- Biberman, G. & Duchanan, J. (196). Learning styles and study skills differences across business and other academic majors. Journal of Education for Business, 61, 303 – 307.
8-Biggs, J. (1976). Dimensions of study behaviour: Another look at ATI. British Journal of Educational psychology, 46, 68 – 80.
9- Biggs. J. (1979). Individual differences in Study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381 – 394.
10- Biggs, j. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
11- Biggs.J. (1988). Approaches to learning and to essay Writing. In. Schmeck. R.R. (Ed). Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 185-228). New York. NY. US: Plenum Press.
12- Biggs. J. (1993a). What do Inventories of students learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British journal of Educational Psychology. 63- 3- 19.
13- Biggs. J. (1993b). Fom theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Educational Reseearch and development. 12. 73-86.
14- Biggs, J. Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study process Questionnaire: R _ SPQ _ 2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133 _ 149.
15- Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational psychology, 48, 266 – 279.
16- Biggs, J. B. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381 – 394.
17- Biggs, J. B. (1987a) Student approaches to learning and studying. Comberwell , Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research.
18- Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian council for Educational Research.
19- Biggs, J. B. (1987 a). The study process Questionnaire manual Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian council for Educational Research.
20- Biggs, J. B. (1988).The role of metacognition in enhancing learning Australian Journal of Eduction, 32, 127 – 138.
21- Biggs, J. B. (1990).teaching design for learning. Keynote discussion paper of the annual conference off the Higher Education Research and Development society of Australasia, 6 – 9 July, 1990. Griffith University, Brisbane.
22- Bollen. K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York City: Wiley.
23- Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self direction in adult Learning: perspectives on theory, research, and practice. London: Routedge.
24- Burnett, P.C. & Dart, B. C. (2000). The Study Process Questionnaire: a construct validity. Assessment and evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (1), 93-99.
25- CANO-GARCIA, F., & HUGHES, E.H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychol-ogy, 20 (4), 413-430.
26- Bernardo , A.B.Zhang , L.F & Callueng.C.M.(2002).Thinking syle and academic azchievement among Fillipino students.Journal of Genetic Psychology , 163 , 149-163.
27- Beishuizen , J.Stoutjesdijk , E &van-putten ,K.(1994).Studying textbooks.Effects of learning style , study tasks , and instructions.Learning and instruction , 4 , 151-174.
28- Busato , V.V.Prins , F.J.Elshout , J.J.& Hamaker , C(2000).Intellectual ability , learning style personality , achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education.Personality and individual differences , 29-1057-1008.
29- Chork Thayer, S. (1987). The relationship of the knowledge of student perceived learning style preferences, and study habits and attitudes to achievement of college freshmen in a small urban university (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University). Dissertation abstracts international, 48, 827 A.
30- Crewell. J.W. (2003) Research desing: Qualitative. Quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (2nd Ed.) Saga.
31- Dahlgren. L. O. & Marton F. (1978). Students conceptions of subject matter: An aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 3. 25-35
32- Davis. J. E. C. & Sales. G. D. (1996). Dental and Life Science students: A comparison of approaches to study and course perceptions. Medical Education. 30 (6). 453-458.
33- Doe. B. & Nabobo. U. (2003). Reflections on mixed mode and multimode teaching: USP Case Study. Paper Presented at 16th Biennial ODLAA Forum. Canberra. Australia. 1-4 October 2003.
34- Dunn, R., Deckinger, E. L. Withers, P. & Katzenstein, H. (1990) Should college student be taught how to do homework? The effects of studying marketing marketing through individual perceptual strengths. Illinois School Research and Development. 26, 96 – 113.
35- Duke. C. (1986). The Open University- The next sixteen years. Open Learning. 1 (2). 45-47.
36- Diseth , A.(2003).Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement.Educational and psychological , 17,143-155.
37- Eley, M. G. (1991). Differential in Higher Education, 14, 75 – 82.
38- Entwistle. N.J.& Ramsden. P. (1983). Understanding. London: Croom Helm.
39- Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22, 201 – 204.
40- Entwistle. N. J. Tait. H. & McCune. V. (2000). Patterns of espones to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Jouenal of Psychology of Education. 15. 33-48.
41- Fransson. A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning. IV-Effectives of motivation and test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 47. 244-257.
42- Fox, R. A. McManus, I. C. & Winder, B. C. (2001). The shortened study process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis. . British Journal of Educational psychology, 71, 511 – 530.
43- Gibbs. G. (1981). Teaching students to learn: A stuent- centred approach. Milton Keynes: The Open University press.
44- Gibbs. G. (1984).Better teaching or better learning. HERDSA News. 6.1.
45- GRIGORENKO, E. L. & STERNBERG, R.J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic achievement. Exceptional Children, 63, 295-312.
46- Harper.G. & Kember. D. (1985). Learning styles of students in two distance learning institutes. Paper presented at the 13th world conference International Council for Distance Education. Melbourne.
47-Harper. G. & Kember. D. (1986). Approaches to study of distance education students. British Journal of Educational Technology. In press.
48- Haire. J. f. Jr. Anderson. R. E. Tatham. R. L. & Black. W. C.(1995). Mutivariate data analysis with reading (4th ed.) N. J: Prentice Hall.
49- Hattie, J. & Watkins, D. (1981). Australian and Filipino investigations of the internal structure of Biggs' new Study Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational psychology, 51, 241 - 244.
50- Kember. D. (1985) The use of inserted questions in study material for distance education courses. ASPESA Newsletter, 11(1), 12 – 19.
51- Kember, D. & harper, G (1986). Approoches to learning and academic outcomes. Paper presented to the 12th annual HERDSA Conference, Canberra.
52- Kember. D. & leung. D.Y. P (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: an investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 68. 395-407.
53- Kember, D. & Gow, L. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. British Journal of Educational psychology, 60, 356 – 363.
54- Kember, D. & Gow, L. (1990). A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 117 – 128.
55- Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998) The dimensionality of approaches to learning: on investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the Structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational psychology, 68, 395 – 407.
56- Kember, D. Wong, A. & Leung, D. Y. P. (1999). Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 323 – 343.
57- Kirby, P. (1983). Learning style as reflected in instructional design. In L. Curry (Ed.) Learning Style in continuing Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canda.
58- Kratzing, M. (1990). Metaleaning and the facilitation of learning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia. 6 – 9.
59- Marsh. H. W. Balla. J. R. & McDonald. R. P. (1988). Goodness- of- fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin. 103. 391-410.
60- Leung, D. Y. P. & Kember, D. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 61 – 71.
61- Marton, F. Hounsell, D. & Entwistel, N. (1984). The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Acodemic press.
62- Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1976a) On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process I. British Journal of Educational Psycholog, 46, 4 - 11.
63- Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1976b) On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process II. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115 – 127.
64- Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1- Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4 – 11.
65- Matthews, D. B. (1991). Learning styles of education majors: Are they similar to those of other students? SEATE Journal, 1, 28 – 32.
66- Matthews, D. B. (1994). An investigation of students learning Styles in various disciplines in colleges and universities. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 33, 65 – 74.
67- McCombs, B. L. (1988). Motivational skills training: Combining metacognitive, cojnitive, and affective learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (Chapter 9). San Diego, CA: Academic press Inc.
68- McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regalated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenalogical view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.) Self-regalated learning and academic achievement: theory, research, and practice (Chapter 3). New York; Springer – Verlag.
69- Morgan, A., Gibbs, G. & Taylor, E. (1980). The work of the study methods group (Study Methods Group Report No. 1). Milton Keynes: The Open University. Institute of Educational Technology.
70- Misra, J. (1998). Learning styles in relation to information processing modes, and multiple talents. Psycho-lingua, 28, 7 – 18.
71- Mueller. R. O. (1996). Basic principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer.
72- Mugler, F. & Landbeck, R. (1997). Learning in the south pacific and phenomonography across Culfures. Higher Education Research and Development, 16 (2), June, 227 – 239.
73- Murphy, S. M. & Tyler, S. (2005). The relationship between learning approaches to part-time study of management courses and transfer of learning to the workplace. Educational Psychology, 25 (5), 455 – 469.
74- Murray – Harvey, R. (1994).Learning styles and approaches to learning: distinguishing between concepts and instruments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 373 – 388.
75- Meichenbaum, D. (1985). Teaching thinking: A cognitive behavioral perspective. In J. W. segal, S. F. Chipman, & Glaser (Eds.) Thinking and learning skills, vol. 2: Research and open questions (chapter 18). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
76- Moses, I. & Ramsden, P. (1992). Academic values and academic practice in the new universities. Higher education research & development, 11, 101 – 118.
77- Murray Harvey, R. (in press). A causal path analysis of factors influencing academic achievement in higher education, In I. Dunn(Ed). Research and development in higher education. Campbell town, NSW: Higher education research and development society of Australasia
78- Newstead, S. E. (1992). A study of two 'quick – and – easy' methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 299 – 312.
79- Niles, F. S. (1995). Cultural differences in learning motivation and learning strategies: A comparison of overseas and Australian students at an Australian university. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19, 369 – 385.
80- Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & bent, D. H. (1975). SPSS Statistical package for the social sciences, New York: McGraw – kill
81- Pask, G. (1976a). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational psychology, 46, 128 – 148.
82- Pask, G. (1976b). Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education. British Journal of Educational psychology, 46, 12 – 25.
83- Pask, G. & Scott, B. C. E. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-machine studies, 4, 12 – 25.
84- Perry 8 Penner .(1999). Multiple Regression in Behhavioral Research (3rd Ed). Fort Worth: Hartcourt Brace College Publishers.
85-Pintrich , P.R.Smith , D.Garcia , T & McKeachie, W.(1993).Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire.Educational and Psychological Measurement , 53,801-813.
86- Ramsden, P. (1983). The Lancaster approaches to studying and course perceptions questionnaire: Lecturers' handbook. Mimeograph, Educational Methods Unit, Oxford Polytechnic.
87- Ramsden, P. & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational psychology, 51, 368 – 383.
88- Richardson, J. T. E (1992). A critical evaluation of a short form of Approaches to Studying Inventory. Psychology Teaching Review, 1, 449-468.
89- Richardson, J. T. E., Landbeck, R. & Mugler, F. (1995). Approaches to Studying in Higher Education: a comparative study in the South Pacific. Educational psychology, 15 (4), 417 – 432.
90-Skogssgberg , K.&.m (2003).Dobiolith majors differ in the study processes and learning styles? Cooleges students Journal , 37 (1) , 27-33.
91-Schouwenburg.H.C.& Kossowska , M.(1999).Learning style : Differential effects of self-control and deep-level information processing on academic achievement.In I Mervielde.I.J.Deary , F.de Fruty , F.Ostendorf (Eds).Personality psychology in Europe.(vol.7.pp.263-281).Tilburg.University Press.
92- Smith, S. N. & Miller, R. J. (2005), Learning approaches: Examination type, discipline of study, and gender. Educational psychology, 25 (1), 43 – 53.
93- STERNBERG, R, J, (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development Human Development, 31, 197-224.
94- STERNBERG, R, J, (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
95- STERNBERG, R, J, & WAGNER, R, K. (1992). Thinking styles Inventory (Unpublished test, Yale University).
96- Svensson, L. (1976). Study skill and learning. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
97- Svensson, L. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning. III – Study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational psychology, 47, 233 – 243.
98- Taxhakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99- Tang, C. & Biggs, J. (1996). How Hong Kong students cope with assessment. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds), The Chinese learning: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 159 – 182). Hong Kong / Melbourne: Comparative Education Research Center / Australian Council for Educational Research.
100- Watkins, D. & Akande, A. (1992). Assessing the approaches to learning of Nigerian students. Assessment, 17, 11 - 20
101- Watkins, D. & Akande, A. (1994). Approaches to learning of Nigerian secondary school students: Emic and etic perspectives. International Journal of psychology, 29, 162 –182.
102- Watkins, D. & Regmi, M. (1996). Towards the cross-cultural validation of a Western model of student approaches to learning. Journal of Cross-Cultural psychology, 27 (5), 547 – 560.
103-Watkins, D., Regmi, M & Estela, A. (1991). The Asian-learning as rote learning Stereotype: Myth of reality? Educational Psychology, 2 (1), 21 – 34.
104- Weistein, C. E. & Palmer, D. R. (1990). The learning and study strategies inventory high school version. Clearwater, FL: H & L Publishing.
105- Wilson, K. L., Smart, R. M. & Watson, R. J. (1996). Gender difference in approach to learning in first year psychology. British Journal of Educational psychology, 66, 59 – 71.
106- Wong, N. Y., Lin, W. Y. & Watkins, D. (1996). Cross-cultural Validation of models of student learning. Educational psychology, 16, 317 – 327.
107- Zimmerman, B, J. (1989). Models of self regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.). Self regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice, N. Y: springer verlag.
108- Zhang, L. F. (2000). University students' learning approaches in three cultures: An investigation of Biggs's 3p Model, The Journal of psychology, 134 (1), 37 – 55.
109- ZHANG, L. F. (2000). Relationship between Thinking Styles Inventory and study process Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Diffences. 29: 841-856.
110- ZHANG, L. F. (2001). Do styles of thinking matter among Hong Kong Secondary school students? Personality and Individual differences, 31, 289-301.
111- ZHANG, L. F. (2002). Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance. Educational psychology, 22, 331-438.
112- ZHANG, L. F. (2004). Revisiting the Predictive Power of Thinking styles for Academic Performance. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 351-370.
113- ZHANG, L. F. & STERNBERG, R. J. (1998). Thinking styles, abilities, and academic achievement among Hong Kong university students. Educational Research Journal, 13, 41-62.
114- ZHANG, L. F. & STERNBERG, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. The Journal of Psychology, 134, 469-489.
115- Zhang , L.F.(2000).University students'learning approaches in three cultures : An investigation of Biggs 3P Model.Jounal of personality , 137,37-55.
116- Z.A.Green.C.Dillion and B.Cryness Journal of Educitional computing Reacarch , 29.(2005).
.