آنی پیپر
دانلود فایل‌های آموزشی دانش‌آموزی و دانشجویی
  2. پایان نامه
  3. پایان نامه زبان های خارجی
  4. پایان نامه DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE WRITTEN ELECTORAL MATERIALS FROM THE 7th PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN IRAN

پایان نامه DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE WRITTEN ELECTORAL MATERIALS FROM THE 7th PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN IRAN

تعداد صفحات: 150 فرمت فایل: word کد فایل: 10003552
سال: 1388 مقطع: کارشناسی دسته بندی: پایان نامه زبان های خارجی
قیمت قدیم:۲۱,۶۰۰ تومان
قیمت: ۱۹,۵۰۰ تومان
دانلود فایل
کلمات کلیدی: 1.Critical discourse analysis - discourse analysis - electoral speeches - language - power and ideology - relationship - social relationships
  • خلاصه
  • فهرست و منابع

  • خلاصه پایان نامه DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE WRITTEN ELECTORAL MATERIALS FROM THE 7th PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN IRAN

    ABSTRACT

              The term discourse analysis has come to be used with a wide range of meaning which cover a wide range of activities. There are many existing approaches to the study of language. One of them which this study is based upon, is critical discourse analysis (CDA). This approach grew out of work in different disciplines in the 1960s and early 1970s, including linguistics, semiotics, psychology, anthropology and sociology. CDA analyses social interactions in a way which focuses upon their linguistic elements, and which sets out to show up their generally hidden determinants in the system of social relationships, as well as hidden effects they may have upon that system. Since CDA is not a specific direction of research, it does not have a unitary theoretical framework. Therefore, in this research project, in order to overcome the potential weaknesses of any single method, a critical linguistic analysis will be adopted from some of the most influential linguists in the field to analyse the formal linguistic features of the written electoral materials from the 7th presidential election in Iran, to explain discourse structures in terms of properties of social interaction and especially social structure, and to focus on the ways discourse structures enact, conform, legitimate, reproduce or challenge relations of power and ideology in society.

     

     

    AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

    To help correct a widespread underestimation of the significance of language in the production, maintenance, and change of social relations of power in Iran.

    To refer to the order of discourse of the society as a whole, which structures the orders of discourse of the various social institutions in a particular way.

    To show that orders of discourse are ideologically harmonized internally or (at the societal level) with each other.

    To stress both the determination of discourse by social structure, and the effects of discourse upon society through its reproduction of social structures.

    To examine the relationship between discourse and sociocultural change.

    So this research project aims to answer the following questions:

    What were the formal textual features of the conservatives’ and reformists’ discourses at the 7th presidential election?

    How did their discourses and strategies change and why?

    What were the ideologies behind the discourse of each group?

    What was the relationship between language of each party and power?

    SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY

    There are many existing approaches to the study of language (e.g. linguistics, sociolinguistics, pragmatics, cognitive psychology, etc.) but while each of them has something to contribute to critical language study, they all have major limitations from a critical point of view.

    The critical discourse analysis upon which this study is based, does not adhere to any particular approach. It is similar to a qualitative research method in that it deals with non-numerical data and can only be validated by other researchers examining the same data.  However, its similarity can only be detected to a certain point because a qualitative research method is either synthetic or holistic, whereas critical linguistics is analytic in nature.  A qualitative method on content analysis is rejected on the grounds of its inability to get beneath the textual surface where the crucial meanings lie.  So in this research a critical linguistic analysis will be adopted from some of the most influential linguists in the field (in order to overcome the potential weaknesses of any single method) including Fairclaough (1989, 1992, 1995), Fowler (1991) and van Dijk (1981, 1985) to :

    Study the theoretical aspects of the subject i.e. explanation and definition of the concepts of ideology, power, discourse, discourse analysis, order of discourse, critical discourse analysis, etc.

    Study the descriptive aspects of the subject, i.e. giving a systematic presentation of a procedure for critical discourse analysis; setting out a view of interrelationship of language and society; illustrating the place of language in society, and showing that language connects with the social through being the primary domain of ideology, and through being both a site of, and a stake in, struggles for power.

    Study the analytic aspects of the subject, i.e. analysing the formal textual features of their statements, press interviews and electoral speeches and manifestoes of the two main candidates for presidency – Khatami and Nategh Noori and their main supporters.

    As the primary sources of the present study, the written electoral materials such as the speeches and manifestoes published in newspapers and the published interviews and debates of the candidates, and as the secondary sources the speeches, statements and articles of other politicians as well as the editorials of the newspapers regarding the presidential election, from the 8th of May, 1997 when the Council of Guardians announced the names of the eligible candidates upto the last day of election (23rd of May, 1997) would be taken into consideration.

    Time period required to complete the research project: Approximately two years.

    Field work: No specific field work is required in this research project.

    Place/libraries where research work is to be carried out: In order to establish a good, rich theoretical framework for the study, I have to visit and search so many libraries and universities such s American centre library, British council library, library of Delhi University, library of JNU (all located in Delhi) as well as the library of Panjab University, Changidarh.

              Since this research project aims to analyse the texts from the seventh presidential election in Iran, and as per the recommendation of the committee I have co-opted a co-supervisor from Iran in my research work, therefore for collecting the relevant materials as well as visiting my co-supervisor I also have to visit Iran.

    PROPOSAL

    Background of the Study: The 1970s saw the emergence of a form of discourse and text analysis that recognized the role of language in structuring power relations in society.  At that time, much linguistic research elsewhere was focused on formal aspects of language which constituted the linguistic competence of speakers which could theoretically be isolated from specific instances of language use (Chomsky, 1957).  Where the relation between language and context was considered, as in pragmatics (Levinson, 1983), with a focus on speakers’ pragmatic / socio-linguistic competence, sentences and components of sentences were still regarded as the basic units.  Much socio-linguistic research at the time was aimed at describing and explaining language variation, language change and the structures of communicative interaction, with limited attention to issues of social hierarchy and power (Labov, 1972; Hymes, 1972).  In such a context, attention to texts, their production and interpretation and their relation to societal impulses and structures, signalled a very different kind of interest (de Beugrande and Dressler, 1981).  The work of Kress and Hodge (1979) and Wodak (1989) serve to explain and illustrate the main assumptions, principles and procedures of what had then become known as critical linguistics.

    Kress (1990 : 84-97) gives an account of the theoretical foundations and sources of critical linguistics.  By the 1990s the label critical discourse analysis came to be used more consistently with this particular approach to linguistic analysis.  Kress (1990 : 94) shows how critical discourse analysis by that time was ‘emerging as a distinct theory of language, a radically different kind of linguistics’.  Many of the basic assumptions of critical discourse analysis that were salient in the early stages, and were elaborated in later development of the theory, are articulated in Kress’s (1989) work.

    Fowler et al. (1979) has been referred to in order to ascertain the early foundations of critical linguistics.  Later work of Fowler (1991, 1996) shows how tools provided by standard linguistic theories (a 1965 version of Chomskyan grammar, and Halliday’s theory of systemic functional grammar) can be used to uncover linguistic structures of power in texts.  Not only in news discourses, but also in literary criticism Fowler illustrates that systematic grammatical devices function in establishing, manipulating and naturalizing social hierarchies.

    Fairclough (1989) sets out the social theories under planning critical discourse analysis, and as in other early critical linguistic work, a variety of textual examples are anlaysed to illustrate the field, its aims and methods of analysis.  Later Fairclough (1992, 1995) and Chouliariki and Fairclough (1999) explain and elaborate some advances in critical discourse analysis, showing not only how the analytical framework for investigating language in relation to power and ideology developed, but also how critical discourse analysis is useful in disclosing the discursive nature of much contemporary social and cultural change.  Particularly the language of the mass media is scrutinized as a site of power, of struggle and also as a site where language is apparently transparent.  Media institutions often purport to be neutral in that they provide space for public discourse, that they reflect states of affairs disinterestedly, and that they give the perceptions and arguments of the newsmakers.  Fiarclaugh shows the fallacy of such assumptions, and illustrates the mediating and constructing role of the media with a variety of examples.

    Van Dijk’s earlier work in text linguistics and discourse analysis (1977, 1981) already shows the interest he takes in texts and discourses as basic units and social practices.  Like other critical linguistic theorists, he traces the origins of linguistic interest in units of language larger than sentences and in text - and context-dependency of meanings. Van Dijk and Kintsch (1983) considered the relevance of discourse to the study of language processing. Their development of a cognitive model of discourse understanding in individuals, gradually developed into cognitive models for explaining the construction of meaning on a societal level. Van Dijk (1985) collected the work of a variety of scholars for whom language and how it functions in discourse is variously the primary object of research, or a tool in the investigation of other social phenomena. This is in a way a documentation of the ‘state of the art’ of critical linguistics in the mid 1980s.

     

  • فهرست و منابع پایان نامه DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE WRITTEN ELECTORAL MATERIALS FROM THE 7th PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN IRAN

    فهرست:

    ندارد.
     

    منبع:

    References

    Akmajian, A. & Heny, F. (1975) An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Albrow , M. (1999) Sociology : The Basics . London : Routledge.

    Althusser, L. & Balibar, E. (1970) Reading Capital. London : New Left Books.

    Anthonissen, C. (2001) "On the effectiveness of media censorship: linguistic, paralinguistic and other communicative devices of media regulation." Ph.D. thesis: University of Vienna.

    Austin, J.L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogical Imagination. Texas: University of Texas Press.

    Bakhtin, M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.

    Bakker, C. (1997) "Membership categorization and interview accounting." In D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.

    Bazerman, C. (1998) Shaping Written Knowledge : The Genre and Activity of the

    Becker, F., Gerhard, U. & Link, J. (1997) "Modern Kollektivsymbolik. Eine diskurstheoretisch orientierter Forschungsbericht mit Auswahlbibliographie." Internationales Archiv fur Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur (IASL), 22(1): 70-154.

    Belsey, C. (1980) Critical Practice. London: Routledge.

    Bellah, R.N. (1973) Emile Durkheim: On Morality and Society, Selected Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Benke, G. (2000) "Diskursanalyse als sozialwissenchaftliche untersuchungsmethode." SWS Rundschau, 2:140-62.

    Bennett, T. (1979) Formalism and Marxism. London: Methuen.

    Bennett, T. (1998) Culture. London : Sage.

    Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T.N. (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Bernstein, B. (1971) Class, Codes and Control. Vol 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Benstein, B. (1990) The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London : Routledge.

    Bhaskar , R. (1986) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London : Verso.

    Bhatia, V. (1983) An Applied Discourse Analysis of English Legislative Writing. Birmangham: University of Aston Language Studies Unit.

    Bhatia, V. (1993) Analaysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

    Bhatia V. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse: London : Continuum.

    Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. & Radley, A.R. (1988) Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage.

    Birch, D. (1989) Language, Literature and Critical Practice. London: Routledge.

    Bjerke , F. (2000) Discursive Governance Structures.  Working paper,  Institute of social Sciences and Business Economics. Denmark: Roskilde University.

    Blakemore, D. (1992) Understanding Utterances : an Introduction to Pragmatics .

    Blommaert, J. and Bulcaen, H. (2000) "Critical discourse analysis: An overview." Annual Anthropological Review (forthcoming).

    Boden, D. & Zimmerman, D.H. (1991) (eds.) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Bourdieu , P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge : Polity Press.

    Bourdieu ,P. & Wacquant, L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge:        Polity Press.

    Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Brown, R. & Ford, M. (1964) "Address in American English." in D. Hymes (ed.) Language in Culture and Society. New York: Harper and Row.

    Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960) "The pronouns of power and solidarity." In T.A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1972) "The pronouns of power and solidarity." In P.P. Giglioli (ed.) Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    C. Schafner (eds.) Politics asTtalk and Text : Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse.  Amsterdam : John Benjamins.

    Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. & Coulthard, M. (1996) Text and Practice: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Calhoun, C. (1995) Critical Social Theory. London: Blackwell.

    Carter, R., Goddard, A., Reah, D., Sanger, K. & Bowring, M. (1997) Working with Texts: A core book for language analysis. London: Routledge.

    Chafe, M. (1979) "The flow of thought and the flow of language." In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics. Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press.

    Chandler , D. (2002) Semiotics : The basics . London : Routledge.

    Chilton, P. (1990) “Politeness, politics and diplomacy”. Discourse & Society. 1(2): 201-24.

    Chilton, P. (2004) Anlysing Political Discourse . London : Routledge.

    Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structure. The Hague: Mouton.

    Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chouliaraki, L. (1995) Regulation and Heteroglossia in One Institutional Context. The Case of a `Progressivist' English Classroom. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of Lancaster.

    Ciccourel, A. (1972) "Basic and normative rules in the negotiation of status and rule." In D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press.

    Cicourel, A. (1981) "Language and structure of belief in medical communiction." In B. Sigurd and J. Svartvik (eds.) Processings of AILA 81 Studia Linguistica, 5: 71-85.

    Cook, G. (1989) Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Coulthard, M. (1977) Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

    Coulthard, M. (1985) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

    Coupland , N. & Jaworski, A. (2001) “Discourse”, In P. Cobley (ed.) Semiotics and           Linguistics . London : Routledge.

    Coupland, N. & A. Jaworsk (eds.) Sociolinguistics : A reader and Course Book. London : Macmillan.

    Coupland, J. (1996) “Dating advertisements : discourse of the commodified self”.                         Discourse & Society. 7: 187-207.

    Crystal, D. (1987) The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Cutting, J. (2002) Pragmatics and Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.

    Dant, T. (1991) Knowledge, Ideology and Discourse : A Sociological Perspective.

    de Beaugrande, R.A. & Dressler, W.U. (1981) Einfuhrung in die Textlinguistik. Tubingen: Niemeyer.

    de Beaugrande, R.A. (1980) Text, Discourse and Process: Towards a Multidisciplinary Science of Texts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Drew, A., Gerhard, U. & Link, J. (1985) "Moderne Kollektivsymbolik. Eine diskurstheoretisch orientierte Einfuhrung mit Auswahlbibliographie." Internationales Archiv fur Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur (IASL), 1st special edition: 256-375. Tubingen: Forschungsreferate.

    Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Dudley-Evans, T. (1994) "Genre analysis: an approach for text analysis for ESP." In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Dudley-Evans, T. (1995) "Genre models for the teaching of academic writing to second language speakers: advantages and disadvantages." Journal of TESOL France, 2(2): 181-92.

    Duranti, A. (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Durkheim, E. (1933) The Division of Labour in Society. G. Simpson. trans. New York: Free Press.

    Duveen, G. & Lloyd, B. (1990) (eds.) Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Eagleton, T. (1980) "Text, ideology, realism." In E.W. Said (ed.) Literature and Society. Baltimore: John Hopkins.

    Eagleton, T. (1991) Ideology . London : Verso.

    Eagleton, T. (1994) Ideology. London: Longman.

    Eco, U. (1985) Lector in fabula: la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi. Milano: Bompiani.

    economic development”. International Social Science Journal.155:29-         45.

    Eggins, S. & Slade, D. (1997) Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassel.

    Eggins, S. and Martin , J. (1997) “Genres and registers of discourse”. In T.van Djik

    English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

    Ervin-Tripp, S.M. (1972) "Sociolinguistic rules of address." In J. Pride & J. Holmes (eds.) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Experimental Article in Science. Madison, Wis : University of Wisconsin    Press.

    Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. 1st edn. London: Longman.

    Fairclough, N. (1992a) "Introduction." In. N. Fairclough (ed.) Critical Language Awareness. London: Longman.

    Fairclough, N. (1992b) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Fairclough, N. (1992c) (ed.) Critical Language Awareness. London: Longman.

    Fairclough, N. (1993) "Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: the universities." Discourse & Society, 4: 133-68.

    Fairclough, N. (1995a) Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

    Fairclough , N. (1995b) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

    Fairclough , N. (1998). “Political discourse in the media”. In A. Bell & P., Garrett (eds.) Approaches to Media Discourse : Oxford: Blackwell.

    Fairclough, N. (1999) "Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis." In A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (eds.) The Discourse Reader. London and New York: Routledge.

    Fairclough , N. (2000 a)” Discourse , social theory and social research : the case of             welfare reform”. Journal of Sociolinguistics . 4: 163-95.

    Fairclough , N. (2000b) New Labour , New Language? London : Routledge.

    Fairclough, N. (2001a) "Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research." In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Fairclough , N. (2001b) “ The dialectics of discourse”. Textus . 14: 231-42.

    Fairclough , N. (2003) Analysing Discourse. London : Routledge.

    Fairclough, N. & Kress, G. (1993) "Critical discourse analysis." Unpublished manuscript.

    Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997) "Critical discourse analysis." In T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. London: Sage.

    Fairclough , N., Jessop, R. & Sayer, A. (2002) “ Critical realism and Semiosis”.

    Fasold, R. (1990) Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Fillmore, C.J. (1968) "The case for case." In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Firestone, W.A. (1983) "Alternative agreements for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research." Educational Researcher, 22: 16-23.

    Firth, J.R. (1957) Papers in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Foertsch, J. (1995) "The impact of electronic networks on scholarly communication: avenues to research." Discourse Processes, 19: 301-28.

    Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaelogy of knowledge. New York : Pantheon.

    Foucault , M. (1979) Discipline and Punish : the Birth of the Prison. New York : Vintage.

    Foucault, M. (1981) History of Sexuality. vol.1. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Foucault, M. (1982) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings by Michel

    Foucault, M. (1984) "The order of discourse." In M. Shapiro (ed.) Language and Politics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Fowler, R. (1977) "Literature as discourse." In G. Vesey (ed.) Communication and Understanding. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Fowler, R. (1981) Literature as Social Discourse. London: Batsford.

    Fowler, R. (1985) "Power." In T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. vol.4: Discourse Analysis in Society. London: Academic Press.

    Fowler, R. (1987) "Notes on critical linguistics." In R. Steele & T. Threadgold (eds.) Language Topics: Essays on Honour of Micheal Halliday. Vol.II. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Fowler, R. (1991) "Critical linguistics." In K. Halmkjaer (ed.) The Linguistic Encyclopedia. London and New York: Routledge.

    Fowler, R. (1996) Linguistic Criticism. Second edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Fowler, R. (2001) (ed.) A Dictionary of Modern Critical Terms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G. & Trew, T. (1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Froman, C. (1992) Language and Power. London: Humanities Press.

    Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Garfinkel, H. (1974) "On the origins of the term ethnomethodology." In R. Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Garrett, P & Bell, A. (1998) “ Media and discourse : a overview”. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (eds.) Approaches to Media Discourse .Oxford: Blackwell.

    Georgakopoulou, A. & Goutsos, D. (1997) Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Giddens , A. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity. Cambridge : Polity Press.

    Girce, H.P. (1975) "Logic and conversation." In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics. Volume 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.

    Girnth, H. (1996) "Texte im politischen Diskurs. Ein Vorschlag zur diskursor-lentierten Beschreibung von Textsorten." Muttersprache, 106(1): 66-80.

    Givon, T. (1979) "From discourse to syntax: grammar as a processing strategy." In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics. Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press.

    Givon, T. (1989) Mind, Code, and Context: Essay in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Goatly , A. (1997) The Language of   Metaphors . London : Routledge.

    Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Goffman, E. (1963) Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.

    Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Doubleday Anchor.

    Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Goffman, E. (1983) "The interaction order." American Sociological Review, 48: 1-17.

    Graham , P.(2001)“Contradictions and institutional convergences : genre as method” .

    Grice, H. (1981) “ Presupposition and conversational implicature”. In P. Cole (ed.)

    Grice, H.P. (1957) "Meaning." Philosophical Review, 67: 377-88.

    Grimes, J. (1975) The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.

    Grimshaw, A. (1981) Language as Social Resource. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (1972) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Gumperz, J.J. (1982a) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Gumperz, J.J. (1982b) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Habermas, J. (1977) Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Habermas, J. (1984) Theory of Communicative Action. vol.1. London : Heinemann.

    Hall, S. (1996) "The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees." In D. Morley & K.H. Chen (eds.) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.

    Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1985) (1989) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Ist & 2nd ends. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Halliday, M.A.K. (1970) "Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mode in English." Foundations of Language, 6: 327-51.

    Halliday, M.A.K. (1970) The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman.

    Halliday, M.A.K. (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.

    Halliday, M.A.K. (1976) "Anti-languages." UEA Papers in Linguistics, 1: 15-45.

    Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotics:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

    Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) (1994) Introduction to Functional Grammar. First and Second edns. London: Arnold.

    Hammersley, M. (1997) "On the foundations of critical discourse analysis." Language & Communication, 17(3): 237-48.

    Hammond , J. & Derewianka, B. (2001) “ Genre”. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (eds.)

    Haroche, C., Henry, P. & Pecheux, M. (1971) "La semantique et la coupure sausurienne: Langue, langage, discours." Lanqgages, 6(24): 93-106.

    Harris, Z. (1951) Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Harris, Z. (1952) "Discourse analysis." Language, 28: 1-30.

    Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Hasan , R. (1996) Ways of Saying : Ways of Meaning . London : Cassell.

    Hatch, E. (1992) Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Hawisher, G. & Selfe, C. (2000) (eds.). Globals Literacies and the World–Wide Web.

    Hawthorn, J. (1992) A Concise Glossary of Contemporary Literary Theory. London: Edward Arnold.

    Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Heritage, J. (1985) "Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience." In T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. vol 3. Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press.

    Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction: an Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Howarth, D. (2002) Discourse. New Delhi: Viva Books.

    Hudson, R.A. (1980) Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Hymes, D. (1962) "The ethnography of speaking." In T. Gladwin & W.C. Sturtevant (eds.) Anthropology and Human Behavior. Anthropological Society of Washington.

    Hymes, D. (1972) "Models of the interaction of language and social life." In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Blackwell.

    Hymes, D. (1974a) "Toward ethnographies of communication." In D. Hymes. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Hymes, D. (1974b) "Why linguistics needs the sociologist." In D. Hymes. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Hymes, D. (1974c) "Linguistics as sociolinguistics." In D. Hymes. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: an Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Hymes, D. (1974d) Foundations in Sociolinguistics: an Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Iedema, R. (1997) "Interactional dynamics and social change; planning as morphogenesis." Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of Sydney.

    Iedema, R. (1999) "Formalizing organizational meaning." Discourse and Society, 10(1): 49-66.

    Jager, S. (1993) Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einfuhrung. Duisburg: DISS.

    Jager, S. (1996) "Diskurstheorian." In H. Hierdeis & T. Hug (eds.) Taschenbuch der Padagogik. revised and enlarged edn. Hohengehren: Schneider.

    Jager, S. (2001) "Discourse and Knowledge: theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis." In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Jaquemet, M. (1996) Credibility in Court: Communicative Practices in the Camorra Trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Jaworski, A. & Coupland, N. (1999) "Introduction." In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (eds.) The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.

    Jessop , B.(1998) “The rise of governance and the risks of failure : the case of

    Jorgensen, W. & Phillips, L. (1999) Diskursanalyse som Teori og Metode. Roskilde: Samfunds Litteratur.

    Journal of Critical Realism. 5(1) : 2-10.

    Journal of Future Studies. 5(4): 1-30.

    Kress, G. & Hodge, B. (1979) Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.

    Kress, G. & Threadgold, T. (1988) "Towards a social theory of genre." Southern Review, 21.

    Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.

    Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. London : Arnold.

    Kress, G. (1976) (ed.) Halliday: System and Function in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Kress, G. (1977) "Tense as modality." UEA Papers in Linguistics, 5: 40-52.

    Kress, G. (1978) "Poetry as anti-language: a reconsideration of Donne's `Nocturnall upon S. Lucies Day'." PTL, 3: 327-44.

    Kress, G. (1985a) "Ideological structures in discourse." In T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. vol.4. London: Academic Press.

    Kress, G. (1985b) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural practice. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Kress, G. (1989) "History and language: towards a social account of linguistic change." Journal of Pragmatics, 13(3): 445-66.

    Kress, G. (1990) "Critical discourse analysis." Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11: 84-99.

    Labov, W. (1972a) (ed.) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Labov, W. (1972b) "The transformation of experience in narrative syntax." In W. Labov. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Labov, W. (1972c) "Introduction." In W. Labov. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Labov, W. (1972d) "Rules for ritual insults." In W. Labov. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Labov, W. (1972e) "The social stratification of (r) in New York City department stores." In W. Labov. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Labov, W. (1972f) Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Labov, W. (1984) "Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation." In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (eds.) Language in Use. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Labov, W. & Waletsky, J. (1967) "Narrative analysis." In J. Helm (ed.) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Laclau, E. (1981) Politik und Ideologie im Marxismus. Kapitalismus-Faschismus-Populismus. Berlin: Argument.

    Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso.

    Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.

    Lakoff, G. & Johnson , M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

    Larrain , J. (1979) The Concept of Ideology . London : Hutchinson.

    Leach, E. (1964) "Animal categories and verbal abuse." In E. Lenneberg (ed.) New Directions in the Study of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Leech, G.N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

    Leech, G.N. & Short, M.H. (1981) Style in Fiction. London: Longman.

    Leontjew, A.N. (1982) Tatigkeit, Bewusstsein, Personlichkeit. Cologne: Pahl-Rugenstein.

    Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Levi-Strauss, C. (1967) Structural Anthropology. New York: Anchor Books.

    Link, J. & Link-Heer, U. (1990) "Diskurs/Interdiskurs und Literaturanalyse." Zeitschrift fur Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft (LiLi), 71: 88-99.

    Link, J. (1982) "Kollektivsymbolik und Mediendiskurse." KultuRRevolution. 1: 6-21.

    Lockwood, D. (1973) "The distribution of power in industrial society: a comment." In J. Urry & J. Wakeford (eds.) Power in Britain: Sociological Readings. London: Heinemann.

    London : Routledge.

    London : Routledge.

    Luke, A. (1995/6) "Text and discourse in education: an introduction to critical discourse analysis." In M. Apple (ed.) Review of Research in Education, 21. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Macdonell, D. (1986) Theories of Discourse: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Mann, M. (1983) Encyclopedia of Sociology. London: Macmillan.

    Mannheim, K. (1955) Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harvest Books.

    Martin , J.F. ; Christie,  . &  Rohthery, J. (1987)  "Social process in education" . In I.

    Martin, J. & Hasan, R. (1989) (eds.) Language Development: Learning Language, Learning Culture. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Martin, J. (1992) English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    McCarthy, M. (1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    McCarthy, M. (2001) “Discourse”. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (eds.) Teaching

    McCarthy, M., Matthiessen, C. & Slade, D. (2002) "Discourse analysis." In N. Schmitt (ed.) An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. London: Arnold.

    McEnery, T. & Wilson, A. (2001) Courpus Linguistics. Edinburgh : Edingburgh University Press.

    Merton, R.K. (1967) On Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Mesthrie, R., Swann, J., Deumert, A. & Leep, W. (2000) Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Mey, J.L. (1993) Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Meyer, M. (2001) "Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approach to CDA". In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Mills, S. (1997) Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.

    Morley, D. (1980) "Texts, readers, subjects." In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe & P. Willis (eds.) Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson.

    Morris, C. (1938) "Foundations of the theory of signs." In O. Neurath, R. Carnap & C. Morris (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Moscovici, S. (1981) "On social representations." In J. Forgas (ed.) Social Cognition. Perspectives on Everyday Understanding. London: Academic Press.

    Mouzelis, N. (1995) Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnoses and Remedies. London: Routledge.

    Muntigl, P., Weiss, G. & Wodak, R. (2000) (eds.) European Union Discourses on Un/employment. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-making and Organizational Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Ng, S.H. & Bradac, J.J. (1993) Power in Language. London: Sage.

    Ochs, E. (1979) "Planned and unplanned discourse." In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics. Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press.

    Ochs, E. (1988) Culture and Language Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Ohmann, R. (1976) English in America: A Radical View of the Profession. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Paltridge, B. (1995) "Genre analysis and the identification of textual bundaries." Applied Linguistics, 16: 288-99.

    Parkin, T. (1971) Class, Inequality, Political Order. St. Albans: Paladin.

    Parsons, T. & Shils, E. (1951) (eds.) Towards a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Pecheux, M. (1975) (1982) Language, Semantics and Ideology. London: Macmillan.

    Pecheux, M. (1988) "Discourse: structure or event?" In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. London: Macmillan.

    Pecheux, M., Henry, P., Poitou, J-P. & Haroche, C. (1979) "Un example d'ambiguite ideologique: Le rapport Mansholt." Technologies et Pratiques, 1(2).

    Perakyla, A. (1997) "Reliability and validity in research based on transcripts." In D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.

    Piaget, J. (1970) Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.

    Popper , K. (1962).The Open Society and Its Enemies. 2vols. London: Routledge.

    Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.

    Potter, J. (1997) "Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring data." In D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.

    Pugh, R. (1996) Effective Language in Health and Social Work. London: Chapman and Hall.

     Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.

    Rampton, B. (1995) Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.

    Reid (ed.). The Place of Genre in Learning. Center for studies of Literacy ducation. Geelong, Victoria : Deakin University Press.

    Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Roberts, C., Davies, E. & Jupp, T. (1992) Language and Discrimination: A Study of Communication in Multi-ethnic Workplaces. London: Longman.

    Robin, R. (1973) Historie et linguistique. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversations. Vols I and II. edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Sapir, E. (1933) "Communication." Encyclopedia of the Social Science, 4: 78-81.

    Sapir, E. (1949) Language, Culture and Personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Saussure, F. (1959) (1974) Course in General Linguistics. London: Fontana.

    Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science. London : Sage.

    Schegloff, E.A. & Sacks, H. (1973) (1999) "Opening up closings." In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (eds.) The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.

    Schegloff, E.A. (1999) "Talk and social structure." In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (eds.) The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.

    Schegloff, E.A., Ochs, E. & Thompson, S.A. (1996) "Introduction." In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Schiffrin, D. (1988) "Sociolinguistic approaches to discourse: topic and reference in narrative." In K. Ferrera et al. (eds.) Linguistic Contact and Variation. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

     Sciences and Business Economics. Denmark : Roskilde University.

    Scollon, R. (2001a) "Action and text: towards an integrated understanding of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action." In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Scollon, R. (2001b) Mediated Discourse. The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.

    Searle, J.R. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Searle, J.R. (1975) "Indirect speech acts." In P. Cole & J. Morgran (eds.) Syntax and Semantics. vol.3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

    Searle, J.R. (1979) "The classification of illocutionary acts." Language in Society, 8: 137-51.

    Searle, J.R. (1989) "On conversation." In J.R. Searle (ed.) (On) Searle On Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Seidel, G. (1985) "Political discourse analysis." In T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. vol.4: Discourse Analysis in Society. London: Academic Press.

    Sherzer, J. (1983) Kuna Ways of Speaking. Austin: University of Texas Pres.

    Silverman, D. (1997) (ed.) Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.

    Silverstone, R. (1999) Why Study the Media ?  London : Sage.

    Simpson, P. (1993) Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.

    Sinclair, J. McH. & Coulthard, R.M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Smith, C. (1961) "A class of complex modifiers in English." Language, 37: 342-65.

    Spencer-Oatey, H. & Zegarc, V. (2002) "Pragmatics." In N. Schmitt (ed.) An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. London: Arnold.

    Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Stilwell Peccei, J. (1999) Pragmatics. London: Routledge.

    Strauss, A.L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analsysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Stubbs, M. (1996) Text and Courpus Analysis. Oxford : Blackwell.

    Stubbs, M. (1997) "Whorf's children: critical comments on CDA." In A. Ryan and A. Wray (eds.) Evolving Models of Language. Papers from the 1996 Annual Meeting of BAAL, Milton Keynes: Multilingual Matters.

    Sumner, C. (1975) Reading Ideologies. London: Academic Press.

    Swales, J. (1981) Aspects of Article Introductions. (Aston ESP Monographs 1). Birmangham: Aston University.

    Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Tannen, D. (1982) "Oral and litral strategies in spoken and written narratives." Language, 58(1): 1-21.

    Tannen, D. (1984) Conversational Style: Analising Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Tannen, D. (1986) "Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative." In F. Coulmas (ed.) Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: Mouton.

    Tansey , S.D. (2000) Politics : The basics . 2nd edn. London : Routledge.

    Taylor, T. & Cameron, D. (1987) Analysing Conversation. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge:       Cambridge Uinversity Press.

    Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.

    Thompson, J. (1984) Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge : Polity Press.

    Thompson, J.B. (1990) Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Threadgold, T. (1989) "Talking about genre: ideologies and incompatible discourses." Journal of Cultural Studies, 3.1.

    Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. & Vetter, E. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Toolan, M. (1997) "What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it?" Language and Literature, 6.

    Trask, R.L. (1999) Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge.

    Trew, T. (1979a) "Theory and ideology at work." In R. Fowler, R. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew. Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Trew, T. (1979b) "Linguistic variation and ideological difference." IN R. Fowler, R. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew. Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Trudgill, P. (1974) The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Turner, R. (1974) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

    University Press.

    van Dijk, T. (1972) Some Aspects of Text Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.

    van Dijk, T. (1978) "New developments and problems in text linguistics." In J. Petofi (ed.) Text vs. Sentence. vol.2. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.

    van Dijk, T. (1981a) "Relevance assignment in discourse comprehension." Discourse Processes, 2: 113-26.

    van Dijk, T. (1981b) Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague/Berlin: Mouton.

    van Dijk, T. (1985a) (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 4 Vols. New York: Academic Press.

    van Dijk, T. (1985b) "Introduction: the role of discourse analysis in society." In T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 4: Discourse Analysis in Society. London: Academic Press.

    van Dijk, T. (1985c) "Introduction: discourse as a new cross-discipline." In T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 1: Disciplines of Discourse. New York: Academic Press.

    van Dijk, T. (1986) Racism in the Press. London: Arnold.

    van Dijk, T. (1988a) News Analysis :Case Studies of  International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.

    van Dijk, T. (1988b) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Elbaum Associates.

    van Dijk, T. (1993a) "Editor's Foreword." Discourse and Society, 4(2): 131-2.

    van Dijk, T. (1993b) "Principles of critical discourse analysis." Discourse and Society, 4(2): 249-283.

    van Dijk, T. (1997) (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.

    van Dijk, T. (1998a) "Critical discourse analysis." In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (in prepration). In :www///http /cj/progra~1/delrina/wincomm/download.

    van Dijk, T. (1998b) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

    van Dijk , T. (1998c) “Opinions and ideologies in the press”. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (eds.) Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford : Blackwell.

    van Dijk, T. (2001) "Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity." In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    van Dijk , T. (2002) “ Ideology : political discourse and cognition”. In P. Chilton & van Dijk, T. & Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    van Leeuwen, T. & Wodak, R. (1999) "Legitimizing immigration control. A discourse-historical analysis." Discourse Studies, 1(1): 83-118.

    van Leeuwen, T. (1987) "Generic strategies in press journalism." Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(2): 199-220.

    van Leeuwen, T. (1993) "Genre and field in critical discourse analysis." Discourse and Society, 4(2): 193-223.

    van Leeuwen, T. (1996) "The representation of social actors." In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (eds.) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Verschueren , J. (1999) Understanding Pragmatics . London : Arnold.

    Volosinov, V.N. (1973) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Academic Press.

    Wagner, W. (1994) Alltagsdiskurs. Die Theorie sozialer Reprasentationen. Gottingen: Hogrefe.

    Webb, E.J. (1966) Unobtrusive Measures. Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: McNall.

    Wernick , A. (1991) Promotional Culture. London : Sage.

    Whorf , B.L. (1997) “ The relation of habitual thought and behaviour to language”. In N.

    Whorf, B.L. (1956) Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Widdowson , H.G. (1995) “ Discourse anlaysis : a critical views”.  Language and Literature. 4: 157-72.

    Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2001) (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Wodak, R. & van Dijk, T. (2000) (eds.) Racism at the Top. Parlimentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava.

    Wodak, R. (1989) "Introduction." In R. Wodak (ed.) Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Wodak, R. (1996a) Disorders of Discourse. London and New York: Longman.

    Wodak, R. (1996b) "Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis." In J. Verschueren (ed.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Wodak, R. (2000) "Does sociolinguistics need social theory? New perspectives on critical discourse analysis." Keynote speech at SS 2000, Bristol. April 2000.

    Wodak, R. (2001a) "What is CDA about - a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments." In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Wodak, R. (2001b) "The discourse-historical approach." In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

    Yule, G. (1996) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

مطالب مرتبط با این موضوع:
تعداد صفحه: ۲۳۹ دسته بندی: پایان نامه مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات IT

چکیده معماری سرویس گرا به سرعت به عنوان نخستین ائتلاف و راه حل معماری محیطهای محاسباتی ناهمگون و پیچیده معاصر پدیدار گشته است . [1]SOA نیازمند این است که سازمانها مدلهای کسب و کار خود را ارزیابی کنند, به ایجاد تکنیکهای تحلیل و طراحی مبتنی بر سرویس بیاندیشند و طرحهای گسترش و پشتیبانی روابط مابین فروشنده , مشتری و شریک تجاری را ارزیابی کنند . طراحان نمی توانند انتظار مدیریت توسعه ...

تعداد صفحه: ۱۳۳ دسته بندی: پایان نامه مدیریت

پایان‌نامه برای دریافت درجه کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت دولتی چکیده: کوتاهی کارفرمایان در پرداخت حق بیمه واقعی و ناکامی سازمان تأمین اجتماعی در التزام کارفرمایان به پرداخت حق بیمه، به عنوان عمده­ ترین تهدید برای سازمان تأمین اجتماعی تلقی می­شود که، زمینه های به مخاطره افتادن منابع درآمدی سازمان و تحت الشعاع قرار گرفتن منافع نسل های گذشته می­باشد. علیهذا گریز از پرداخت حق بیمه به ...

تعداد صفحه: ۱۷۵ دسته بندی: پایان نامه مهندسی عمران

پایان نامه برای دریافت درجه کارشناسی ارشد ”M.Sc“ مهندسی عمران – راه وترابری چکیده : این رساله روش جامعی را برای طراحی و ارزیابی فنی و اقتصادی بزرگراه ها ارائه می کند که در آن پارامترهای نامعین و اقتصادی با هم تلفیق شده اند.در این تحقیق فرض می شود که خصوصیات جریان ترافیکی در جاده ها دارای ماهیت تصادفی اند.این متغیرهای جریان ترافیکی ، ورودیهایی در روابط فیزیکی و رفتاری اند که ...

تعداد صفحه: ۱۴۷ دسته بندی: پایان نامه تاریخ

پایان‌نامه برای دریافت درجه کارشناسی ارشد رشته تاریخ اسلام مقدمه الف) اهمیت موضوع : ظهور اسلام منشاء تحولات بزرگی در تاریخ جهان گردید که بر همگان پوشیده نیست . تازیان در پرتو این آیین توانستند شاهنشاهی بزرگ ساسانی را از گردونه تاریخ خارج سازند و سرزمینهای بزرگی را از قلمرو روم شرقی تسخیر نمایند. اعراب به نام اسلام تمدن ایرانی را لگدمال تاراج خویش کردند، هر چند پس از مدتی بر ...

تعداد صفحه: ۱۴۸ دسته بندی: پایان نامه حسابداری

پایان نامه برای دریافت درجه کارشناسی ارشد گرایش: حسابداری چکیده: مدیریت نقدینگی در بانک ها تقابلی است بین ریسک و بازده. کمبود نقدینگی از یک سو علاوه بر تحمیل هزینه های سنگین تأمین منابع (از جمله استقراض از بانک مرکزی با نرخهای بالا) ممکن است بانک را تا ورطه ورشکستگی نیز بکشاند. از سوی دیگر نگهداری نقدینگی، بیش از حد مورد نیاز، فرصتهای سرمایه گذاری و توان سودآوری را از بین خواهد ...

تعداد صفحه: ۱۴۶ دسته بندی: پایان نامه حسابداری

پایان نامه برای دریافت درجه کارشناسی ارشد گرایش: حسابداری چکیده: عموماً ا ین گونه تصور می شود که حضور سرمایه گذاران نهادی ممکن است به تغییر رفتار شرکت ها منجر شود. تأثیر سرمایه گذاران نهادی بر تصمیمات مدیریت در قبال تصمیمات مالی در تحقیقات پیشین اثبات شده است.هدف این تحقیق بررسی ارتباط بین عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی و تمرکز مالکیت با مدیریت سود در شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق ...

تعداد صفحه: ۷۱ دسته بندی: تحقیق مقاله روانپزشکی

چکیده: موضوع تحقیق حاضر با توجه به اهمیت بیماری روانی خصوصاً افسردگی در جوامع امروز انتخاب گردیده هدف اصلی مورد نظر در این مطالعه تعیین میزان افسردگی به روش غربالگری (بک) در دختران دبیرستانی تعیین گردیده است. نمونه انتخاب شده شامل 60 نفر می باشد که به روش خوشه­ای و تصادفی انتخاب گردیده است. در هر مقطع تحصیلی اول و دوم و سوم دبیرستان 20 نفر انتخاب گردیده است. بعد از انتخاب گروهها ...

تعداد صفحه: ۲۱ دسته بندی: تحقیق مقاله مهندسی صنایع

جامعه شناسی صنعتی جامعه شناسی اقتصادی به معنی کاربرد دیدگاه جامعه شناختی – مطالعه « الگو ها و فرایند های روابط اجتماعی انسانی » - برای تبیین پدیده اقتصادی است. تعریف جامعه صنعتی وظیفه جامعه شناسی صنعتی است. جامعه شناسی صنعتی یکی از ابعاد جامعه شناسی اقتصادی است. جامعه شناسی اقتصادی به معنی کاربرد دیدگاه جامعه شناختی – مطالعه « الگو ها و فرایند های روابط اجتماعی انسانی » - برای ...

تعداد صفحه: ۱۶۸ دسته بندی: پایان نامه مهندسی صنایع

جهت اخذ درجه کارشناسی ارشد در رشته مدیریت صنعتی چکیده توجه به ارزیابی عملکرد سازمانی در طی سالهای اخیر موجب گسترش چارچوبها و متدولوژی هایی نظیر کارت امتیازدهی متوازن، مدلهای تعالی سازمانی، هزینه یابی بر مبنای فعالیت و ... گردیده که هر یک مزایای گسترده ای را ارائه نموده اند اما مبحث ذی نفعان چندگانه در بخش دولتی در مقایسه با بخش خصوصی که بیشترین توجه را برمشتریان متمرکز می کنند ...

تعداد صفحه: ۱۱۴ دسته بندی: پایان نامه روانشناسی

پایان نامه جهت دریافت درجه کارشناسی ارشد (رشته روان شناسی عمومی) چکیده: :هدف این مطالعه بررسی نقش سبک بدبینانه در پیش بینی اضطراب امتحان و رضایت از زندگی دانش آموزان دوره راهنمایی اردبیل می باشد.پژوهش حاضر توصیفی همبستگی می باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق حاضر را کلیه دانش آموزان دختر دوره راهنمایی شهر اردبیل در سال تحصیلی 92-91 تشکیل می دهند که تعداد آنها برابر 2000 نفر می باشد و نمونه ...

ثبت سفارش
عنوان محصول
قیمت